Analysis

Opposition to AI inside universities is organized, public and more common than you think

Thousands of academics have signed pledges to refuse or ban it, faculty are petitioning to cancel campus AI contracts, and three in four say it will cheapen the degree.

AI Fin ResearchCovers Global
Some of your colleagues are not behind on AI. They have decided against it, and they signed their names.
2,065signatures on a letter asking Dutch universities to ban AI in student assignments
1,458educators who pledged not to use generative AI in marking or course design
74%of faculty in one survey who say generative AI will make degrees worth less

Academics have put the refusal in writing

Letter Signatures on 9 October 2026 What it asks for, in its own words
Stop the Uncritical Adoption of AI Technologies in Academia, 27 June 2025, to Dutch universities and their boards 2,065, of which 1,908 verified “Ban AI use in the classroom for student assignments.” Reconsider “any direct financial relationships between Dutch universities and AI companies.” “Fortify our academic freedom as university staff to enforce these principles”
An open letter from educators who refuse the call to adopt GenAI in education, 6 July 2025 1,458, of which 1,295 verified “We will not use GenAI to mark or provide feedback on student work, nor to design any part of our courses.” “We honor students’ rights to resist and refuse as well”

A July 2026 update to the Dutch letter says one university board had not replied after a year. Neither letter asks for a ban on AI in research. Both treat adoption as something a university can and should decline.

Faculty are fighting the campus contracts

The AAUP calls for faculty control of AI decisions.Its report quotes a member: "no one consulted the faculty before making what they thought was only a tech decision."
Cal State faculty petition to end the OpenAI contract.The petition asks the chancellor to spend the money to "protect jobs at CSU campuses facing layoffs." The contract cost 17 million US dollars.
Hundreds at the University of Colorado sign a letter of dissent.Faculty and students object to a deal worth 2 million US dollars a year. One campus delays student access after faculty concerns.
Uptake at Cal State stays low.16% of faculty and 0.7% of students have finished the voluntary training, CalMatters reports.

Not every campus is opposed. Arizona State’s faculty senate president told Inside Higher Ed that “we have a new technology, but we haven’t seen any cuts to faculty engagement, salaries or hiring.” Cal State’s own survey found 59% of faculty regularly use AI in teaching and research.

Three in four faculty expect it to cheapen the degree

Elon University and the American Association of Colleges and Universities surveyed 1,057 faculty in late 2025. The sample is not scientific, and the authors say it cannot be generalized.

Faculty who say Share
Generative AI will make the integrity and value of degrees worse 74%
It will make them better 8%
It will increase students’ overreliance on AI 95%
Their institution is not well prepared to use it 59%
They have written explicit AI rules for their courses 87%

Wharton went all-in on AI. Yet one of its data engineers had told developers not to buy the hype.

In October 2023 Tim Allen, who introduced himself as “a principal engineer at Wharton Research Data Services,” gave a DjangoCon talk titled “Don’t Buy the ‘A.I.’ Hype.” Seven months later Wharton Magazine ran the dean’s AI plans under the headline “Going All-In on AI.” Wharton runs the data service most finance schools query through, so assume the same split exists on your own campus.

Asia is moving the other way

The same months look different in Asia. Japan’s financial regulator told firms not to hold back on AI, Chinese brokers put a new model into use within hours, and researchers in China, Japan and Korea publish their paper pipelines as how-to guides. A Taiwan-built pipeline that runs a paper from literature search to final draft has 51,081 GitHub stars. A Western finance researcher is competing with people who are being told to go faster.

Find out where your campus stands

  1. Search for your university’s name with “AI” and “petition”, “open letter” or “resolution”. If faculty have organized against a campus AI deal, you need to know before you ask for one.
  2. Read your library’s page on AI and licensed content. Many say flatly that contracts forbid it. The licensed data guide quotes two.
  3. Ask who decides. A committee of people who signed a refusal will not approve your agent. Find the person with budget authority and ask them in writing.
  4. Do not wait for consensus. A new model ships every 10 days. Work on public data with your own plan while the argument runs.
  5. Sign your own name. The refusers are organized and you are not. One page from five finance faculty asking for agent access to licensed data is a counterweight a dean can point to.

Sources

Related

Analysis

Throw out what you knew about AI before September

Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra and Opus 5.5 arrived inside five weeks. One science benchmark doubled in two months. A test you ran in the spring describes a different technology.

Anthropic, Introducing Claude Opus 5.5Global